THE CASE FILES CASE 015 — TOOTH #3

Scheduled for extraction, still here.

Another provider said the tooth had to go — a perforation, a draining sinus tract, a root canal that had failed. Five years after combined retreatment and surgical repair, it's still doing its job.

SURGERY ✦✦✦ EXTREME 2 PHASES
5-year recall radiograph — bone fill, no recurrent infection, tooth in function
Pre-operative periapical of tooth #3 — prior root canal with persistent pathology and perforation defect
BEFORE AFTER
◂▸
Scheduled for extraction, still here
CASE 015 — SURGERY · TORRANCE
THE PLATES — FULL SEQUENCE
THE CASE

One tooth's journey, in four beats.

01
THE PROBLEM

The extraction was already recommended.

The tooth had a perforation, a sinus tract draining infection from the bone, and a root canal that hadn't resolved the problem. The recommendation to extract wasn't unreasonable. The patient wanted one more opinion before losing the tooth.

02
THE PICTURE

At the edge — not past it.

Imaging showed the perforation defect, anatomy the first treatment never reached, and persistent infection. The combination put the tooth at the edge of what's salvageable. Edge is not past. We saw a path, and we were honest about the odds.

03
THE WORK

Two procedures, one save.

First, non-surgical retreatment: the missed anatomy located, disinfected, medicated, and sealed. Then the surgical phase: a small flap, the diseased tissue removed, and both the root end and the perforation repaired with MTA — a bioceramic that bonds to dentin and supports the bone growing back.

04
THE RETURN

Five years, still working.

Recalls at two months, one year, three years, and five years. Bone filled in around the repaired root, the sinus tract never returned, and the tooth another provider had scheduled for extraction is still in normal function.

THE PROTOCOL
  •   Second-opinion consultation with CBCT before any irreversible decision
  •   Non-surgical retreatment — previously missed anatomy located and disinfected
  •   Calcium hydroxide medication between visits; obturation to length
  •   Surgical phase — flap access, curettage of the infected tissue
  •   Root-end resection and MTA seal; perforation repaired with MTA
  •   Recalls at 2 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years — progressive bone fill at each
WHAT THIS CASE TEACHES

What this case teaches.

SECOND OPINION The answer can change with the specialist Not every tooth flagged for extraction needs to come out. A consultation costs less than an extraction — and the answer may be different.
MIDDLE GROUND Between root canal and extraction is a whole specialty Apical surgery, MTA repair, intentional reimplantation — routine endodontic work that saves teeth simple retreatment can't.
TIME Five years is the proof A save only counts if it lasts. This one has been recalled for five years and is still in function.
CLINICAL DISCLAIMER: PRESENTED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES WITH PATIENT CONSENT. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION REMOVED PER HIPAA. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS VARY. ALL IMAGES REPRESENT ACTUAL PATIENT TREATMENT.
MORE FROM RETREATMENT & REPAIR
  • Out, repaired, and home again — A failing root canal locked behind a large metal post — unreachable from above, impractical from the side. So the tooth came out, was repaired in fifteen minutes, and went back in.
  • Sealing the wrong turn — A drill searching for a canal went 2mm past where it should have — straight into the furcation. Three hours later the hole was sealed, and three years later the tooth is still here.
  • Six problems, one tooth — A failing root canal hiding a separated file, a calcified canal, a missed canal, internal resorption, and a crack — quiet and healed 3.4 years after retreatment.
SEE ALL RETREATMENT & REPAIR CASES →
VIEW ALL 15 CASES

Told your tooth has to come out?

Bring the X-rays. A second opinion is a conversation, not a commitment — and sometimes it changes everything.